Document généré le 20/04/2026 depuis l'adresse: https://www.documentation.eauetbiodiversite.fr/fr/notice/une-lumiere-clignotante-pas-si-visible-que-ca-une-revue-systematique-sur-les-frequences-de-fusion-critique-
Une lumière clignotante pas si visible que ça: une revue systématique sur les fréquences de fusion critique
Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s)
Éditeur(s)
Identifiant documentaire
25-4050147
Identifiant OAI
4050147
Notice source
https://hal.science/hal-04050147v1
Auteur(s):
Lafitte Alix,Sordello Romain,Legrand Marc,Nicolas Virginie,Obein Gaël,Reyjol Yorick
Mots clés
ALAN
Dark Infrastructure
Lighting
Temporal resolution
Vision
Date de publication
30/12/2022
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue
Thème
Type de ressource
Source
Droits de réutilisation
Région
Département
Commune
Description
Background: Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous by a species, usually called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), could thus help further identify the impacts of artificial lighting on animals. Objective: This review aimed at answering the following questions: what is the distribution of CFF between species? Are there differences in how flicker is perceived between taxonomic classes? Which species are more at risk of being impacted by artificial lighting flicker? Methods Citations were extracted from three literature databases and were then screened successively on their titles, abstracts and full-texts. Included studies were critically appraised to assess their validity. All relevant data were extracted and analysed to determine the distribution of CFF in the animal kingdom and the influence of experimental designs and species traits on CFF. Results At first, 4881 citations were found. Screening and critical appraisal provided 200 CFF values for 156 species. Reported values of CFF varied from a maximum of between 300 Hz and 500 Hz for the beetle Melanophila acuminata D. to a mean of 0.57 (± 0.08) Hz for the snail Lissachatina fulica B. Insects and birds had higher CFF than all other studied taxa. Irrespective of taxon, nocturnal species had lower CFF than diurnal and crepuscular ones. Conclusions: We identified nine crepuscular and nocturnal species that could be impacted by the potential adverse effects of anthropogenic light flicker. We emphasize that there remains a huge gap in our knowledge of flicker perception by animals, which could potentially be hampering our understanding of its impacts on biodiversity, especially in key taxa like bats, nocturnal birds and insects.
Accès aux documents
0
Consultations
0
Téléchargements