Document généré le 13/10/2026 depuis l'adresse: https://www.documentation.eauetbiodiversite.fr/fr/notice/the-pretext-of-foresight-to-debate-on-irrigation-groundwater-management-lessons-from-six-cases-studies-in-france
The pretext of foresight to debate on irrigation groundwater management: lessons from six cases studies in France
Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s)
Éditeur(s)
Identifiant documentaire
8-1331096
Identifiant OAI
1331096
Notice source
https://brgm.hal.science/hal-01331096v1
Auteur(s):
Montginoul Marielle,Figureau Anne-Gaëlle,Garin Patrice,Hérivaux Cécile,Morel Laurianne,Rinaudo Jean-Daniel
Mots clés
Foresight
Groundwater
Date de publication
25/09/2016
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue
Thème
Type de ressource
Source
Droits de réutilisation
Région
Département
Commune
Description
The transcription of the 2000’s European Water Framework Directive in France has led to define maximum volumes that can be abstracted in water bodies. In many French contexts, it requires reducing more or less drastically current water consumption, especially in agriculture where farmers were granted permits by the water policy authority, regardless the real level of water availability. To do so, French water law imposes, where water bodies are structurally in water scarcity, to create irrigation associations charged to share available water between farmers. And the challenge is particularly high in the groundwater case, where farmers are not embedded in collective irrigation schemes. Sharing rules have then to be designed from the ground up. This communication presents and critics the way that innovative management instruments were explored in six cases’ studies representative of the diversity of agricultural products and hydrogeological situations. These instruments were debated during 18 foresight workshops held with institutional representatives (50) and farmers (87). Foresight workshops had the advantages to make credible institutional and resource changes, and to retrieve from current but side-debates. In five cases, researchers took the lead of these workshops, and in the last one it was directly carried by a stakeholder (an Agriculture Chamber), which allows to test the transferability of such a method in real context with a direct implementing goal. Lessons are drawn at several levels. Firstly, debating on contrasted scenarios is a robust way to facilitate discussions on something not implemented yet in France. Secondly, the context highly matters, in particular the perception of the reality of groundwater scarcitylevel. Thirdly, to debate on groundwater management tools has to be firstly embedded in a more general discussion, on the future of agriculture or at least on more broadly water challenges (like in terms of quantity and quality).
Accès aux documents
0
Consultations
0
Téléchargements