Document généré le 17/06/2026 depuis l'adresse: https://www.documentation.eauetbiodiversite.fr/fr/notice/the-effect-of-restrictive-policy-instruments-on-belgian-fishing-fleet-dynamics
Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s)
Éditeur(s)
EDP Sciences
Identifiant documentaire
10-2008037
Identifiant OAI
oai:edpsciences.org:dkey/10.1051/alr:2008037
Auteur(s):
Hendrik Stouten,Aimé Heene,Xavier Gellynck,Hans Polet
Mots clés
Fisheries management
Restrictive policy instruments
Sensitivity simulation
System dynamics
Fleet performance
Fleet dynamics
Date de publication
09/10/2008
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue
en
Thème
Type de ressource
Source
https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2008037
Droits de réutilisation
Région
Département
Commune
Description
Even with the rapid changes in the level of complexity and the uncertainty
of the environment in which Belgian sea fisheries operate, fisheries
management in Belgium is still mainly based on restrictive policy
instruments founded in the biological approach of fisheries management
science. Since they will continue to play an important role, this paper
evaluated changes in three restrictive policy instruments and their effect
on future fleet performance and dynamics, i.e. maximum fishing days, total
quota-restrictions and licences. These effects are tested through scenarios
in a microeconomic simulation model, including sensitivity analysis. This
study opts for a dynamic simulation model based on a microeconomic approach
of fleet dynamics using system dynamics as a modelling technique
(operational base: Vensim®DSS). The results indicated that
changes in maximum fishing days and total quota resulted in higher
fluctuations in fleet performance and dynamics compared to changes in
licences. Furthermore, changes in maximum fishing days and total quota had a
direct impact on fleet performance, though not always as expected, whereas
licences only affected fleet performance indirectly since they only limit
the entry of new vessels to the fleet and they can block the growth of
successful sub fleets.
The outcomes of this study are translated into practical recommendations for
improving fisheries management. Firstly, policy makers need to be more aware
of misperceptions of feedback. Secondly, the results proved that altering
only one type of restrictive policy instrument at a time often fails to meet
desired outcomes. Therefore, policy makers need to find a balance in
combining policy instruments. Finally, this paper opens the discussion on
the future value of restrictive policy instruments in the rapidly changing,
complex and uncertain fisheries environment. It suggests rethinking their
use from “preserving a status quo and social peace” toward a driving
factor in “stimulating fleet dynamics”.
Accès aux documents
0
Consultations
0
Téléchargements