Neotropical peatland methane emissions along a vegetation and biogeochemical gradient

Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s) FLANAGAN Neal,RICHARDSON Curtis J.
Éditeur(s) Riikka Rinnan, University of Copenhagen, DENMARK
Identifiant documentaire 29-1860
Identifiant OAI oai:base-documentaire.pole-tropical.org:1860
Auteur(s): WINTON Scott R.
Mots clés TOURBIERE GROUPEMENT VEGETAL METHANE GAZ A EFFET DE SERRE CHIMIE ORGANIQUE COUVERT VEGETAL
Date de publication 20/10/2017
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue eng
Thème
Type de ressource
Source
Droits de réutilisation

Région

Département

Commune

Description
Tropical wetlands are thought to be the most important source of interannual variability in atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations, yet sparse data prevents them from being incorporated into Earth system models. This problem is particularly pronounced in the neotropics where bottom-up models based on water table depth are incongruent with top-down inversion models suggesting unaccounted sinks or sources of CH4. The newly documented vast areas of peatlands in the Amazon basin may account for an important unrecognized CH4 source, but the hydrologic and biogeochemical controls of CH4 dynamics from these systems remain poorly understood. We studied three zones of a peatland in Madre de Dios, Peru, to test whether CH4 emissions and pore water concentrations varied with vegetation community, soil chemistry and proximity to groundwater sources. We found that the opencanopy herbaceous zone emitted roughly one-third as much CH4 as the Mauritia flexuosa palm-dominated areas (4.7 ± 0.9 and 14.0 ± 2.4 mg CH4 m-2 h-1, respectively). Emissions decreased with distance from groundwater discharge across the three sampling sites, and tracked changes in soil carbon chemistry, especially increased soil phenolics. Based on all available data, we calculate that neotropical peatlands contribute emissions of 43 ± 11.9 Tg CH4 y-1, however this estimate is subject to geographic bias and will need revision once additional studies are published.

0

Consultations

0

Téléchargements