Gut passage times in two bivalve molluscs fed toxic microalgae:

Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s)
Éditeur(s) EDP Sciences
Identifiant documentaire 10-2008018
Identifiant OAI oai:edpsciences.org:dkey/10.1051/alr:2008018
Notice source
Auteur(s): Marielle Guéguen,Patrick Lassus,Mohamed Laabir,Michèle Bardouil,Régis Baron,Véronique Séchet,Philippe Truquet,Zouher Amzil,Laurent Barillé
Mots clés Gut passage Uptake Toxic phytoplankton Risk assessment
Date de publication 05/04/2008
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue en
Thème
Type de ressource
Source https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2008018
Droits de réutilisation

Région

Département

Commune

Description
The occurrence of new phytoplankton species in a coastal area may be explained by the import of shellfish containing whole live algal cells in their digestive tracts. Indeed, shellfish containing toxic algal cells can induce both primary contaminations in safe areas (initially free from toxic microalgae), and secondary contaminations of other shellfish growing in the same area via the faeces of the imported animals. To mitigate this problem, shellfish need to be placed in a separate holding tank and their intestinal content purged. For a deeper understanding of the risks associated with transferring contaminated shellfish, oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and mussels (Mytilus edulis) were purposely fed either Alexandrium minutum or A. catenella (Dinophyceae) or Pseudo-nitzschia calliantha (Bacillariophyceae) toxic algae for 2 h. They were then transferred into individual tanks where they were continuously fed with a non-toxic alga, Tetraselmis suecica. Biodeposit production, faeces composition, and filtration rates were monitored for the shellfish over a 6-h period. The effect of temperature differences and different initial toxic algae concentrations were compared. This study revealed a relationship between temperature and cell lysis in the oyster digestive tract. It also indicated that toxic algae concentration did not seem to influence gut passage time in oysters, while a significant effect was observed in mussels, and confirmed the existence of a difference between oyster and mussel feeding patterns.

0

Consultations

0

Téléchargements