Document généré le 07/09/2026 depuis l'adresse: https://www.documentation.eauetbiodiversite.fr/fr/notice/dimensionality-reduction-for-groundwater-forecasting-under-drought-and-intensive-irrigation-with-neural-networks
Dimensionality reduction for groundwater forecasting under drought and intensive irrigation with neural networks
Titre alternatif
Producteur
Contributeur(s)
Éditeur(s)
Identifiant documentaire
8-5088709
Identifiant OAI
5088709
Notice source
https://hal.science/hal-05088709v1
Auteur(s):
Bouramtane Tarik,Mohsine Ismail,Karmouda Nourelhouda,Leblanc Marc,Estève Yannick,Kacimi Ilias,Hilali Mohamed,Mdhaffar Salima,Tweed Sarah,Tahiri Mounia,Kassou Nadia,El Bilali Ali,Chafki Omar
Mots clés
Principal Component Analysis PCA
Groundwater Level Forecasting
Semi-arid
Long short-term memory
XGBoost
Morocco
Date de publication
01/08/2025
Date de création
Date de modification
Date d'acceptation du document
Date de dépôt légal
Langue
Thème
Type de ressource
Source
Droits de réutilisation
Région
Département
Commune
Description
This study focuses on the Berrechid aquifer system in northern Morocco. Study Focus: The research explores Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for optimizing input selection in groundwater level forecasting using neural networks. PCA efficiently reduces input dimensionality while preserving critical information, making it beneficial for neural network modelling of natural systems with extensive input variables in a low-resource scenarios requiring feature engineering. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model predicted groundwater levels in six monitoring bores using four hydro-climatic variables, precipitation, land surface temperature (LST), actual evapotranspiration (AET), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Model performance was compared using two approaches: the LSTM-XGB model with the bestselected input features and the LSTM-PC1 model based on the first principal component (PC1). New Hydrological Insights for the Region: Results showed that NDVI, AET, and LST were the dominant inputs across different monitoring bores. On average, PC1 accounted for 68.3 % of the variance in hydro-climatic variables, with an eigenvalue of 2.75, surpassing the combined variance of two individual hydro-climatic variables. Both models performed effectively, achieving R² values of 0.982-0.999 during training and 0.885-0.999 during validation. The models successfully captured groundwater fluctuations and the declining trend during drought. LSTM-XGB slightly outperformed LSTM-PC1 in certain cases, but the differences were minimal. The use of PC1 not only mitigates overfitting risks but also allows for generalized predictions across multiple monitoring sites, making it a practical choice for large datasets.
Accès aux documents
0
Consultations
0
Téléchargements